manchester: is city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents club
Weight: 0.65
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.61
, new england
Weight: 0.61
, town
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
Siblings liverpool
Weight: 0.36
, leeds
Weight: 0.35
, melbourne
Weight: 0.35
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is city 1.00
is best city 0.88
is major city 0.87
have down in 10th city 0.86
have down in city 0.86
is queen city 0.81
be described as city 0.80
be called queen city 0.79
be described as industrial city 0.78
be described as first city 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is city)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(leeds, is city)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(portsmouth, is city)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, is major city)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, is city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(liverpool, is city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(liverpool, is city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(portsmouth, is city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(portsmouth, is city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(leeds, is city)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(leeds, is city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(melbourne, is city)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(melbourne, is city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(liverpool, is major city)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(liverpool, is major city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(manchester, is city)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is best city)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is major city)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manchester, have down in city)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is queen city)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be called queen city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be described as city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be described as industrial city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be described as first city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(manchester, is queen city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(manchester, be called queen city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(manchester, is queen city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(manchester, have down in city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(manchester, have down in city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(manchester, be called queen city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(manchester, have down in city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(manchester, is best city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(manchester, be described as industrial city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(manchester, is major city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(manchester, be described as city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(manchester, is queen city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(manchester, be described as first city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(manchester, be described as industrial city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(manchester, is major city)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(manchester, be described as city)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(manchester, is best city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(manchester, be called queen city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(manchester, be described as industrial city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(manchester, is major city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(manchester, be described as first city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(manchester, be described as city)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(manchester, is best city)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(manchester, be described as first city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(manchester, is city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(liverpool, is city)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(portsmouth, is city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(liverpool, is major city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(leeds, is city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is city)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(melbourne, is city)