manchester: be united best in world

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents club
Weight: 0.65
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.61
, new england
Weight: 0.61
, town
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
Siblings liverpool
Weight: 0.36
, leeds
Weight: 0.35
, melbourne
Weight: 0.35
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be united best in world 1.00
be united best 0.97
be united good 0.91
is united 0.89
be united club in world 0.89
be united bad 0.89
be united popular 0.89
was united 0.88
be united best in england 0.88
be united best club support 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(leeds, is united)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, is united)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(liverpool, is united)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(liverpool, is united)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(leeds, is united)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(leeds, is united)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(manchester, be united best in world)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(manchester, is united)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(manchester, be united best in england)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(manchester, is united)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(manchester, is united)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(manchester, be united best in england)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(manchester, was united)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(manchester, be united best in england)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be united popular)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(manchester, be united popular)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(manchester, was united)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is united)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(manchester, was united)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(manchester, was united)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be united best in england)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(manchester, be united popular)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(manchester, be united popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be united best in world)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(manchester, be united best in world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(liverpool, is united)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be united best in world)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(leeds, is united)