manchester: be united in debt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents club
Weight: 0.65
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.61
, new england
Weight: 0.61
, town
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
Siblings liverpool
Weight: 0.36
, leeds
Weight: 0.35
, melbourne
Weight: 0.35
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be united in debt 1.00
is united 0.84
be united bad 0.83
was united 0.83
be called united 0.83
be united good 0.83
be united poor 0.81
be united best 0.81
be united popular 0.81
be united successful 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(leeds, is united)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, is united)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(liverpool, is united)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(liverpool, is united)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(leeds, is united)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(leeds, is united)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(manchester, be united in debt)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(manchester, is united)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(manchester, is united)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(manchester, is united)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(manchester, be called united)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(manchester, was united)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(manchester, was united)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(manchester, was united)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(manchester, be called united)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(manchester, be called united)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be called united)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(manchester, be united popular)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be united popular)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(manchester, was united)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is united)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(manchester, be united popular)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(manchester, be united popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be united in debt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(manchester, be united in debt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(liverpool, is united)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be united in debt)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(leeds, is united)