mandala: is jung

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents graphic
Weight: 0.39
, form
Weight: 0.37
, artwork
Weight: 0.37
, place
Weight: 0.24
Siblings sculpture
Weight: 0.29
, collage
Weight: 0.28
, tapestry
Weight: 0.28
, mosaic
Weight: 0.28
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
is jung 1.00
jung 1.00
be in tae kwon 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(form, be in tae kwon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(mandala, is jung)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mandala, is jung) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(form, be in tae kwon)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mandala, is jung) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(form, be in tae kwon)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(form, be in tae kwon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mandala, is jung) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(mandala, is jung)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mandala, is jung) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(mandala, is jung)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(mandala, is jung) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(mandala, jung)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mandala, is jung) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(mandala, jung)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mandala, is jung) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mandala, jung)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(mandala, is jung) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(mandala, jung)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(mandala, is jung) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(mandala, is jung) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mandala, is jung)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mandala, is jung) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(mandala, is jung)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mandala, is jung) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(form, be in tae kwon)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(mandala, is jung) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(form, be in tae kwon)