mandarin: be more popular than cantonese

Related concepts

Parents	chinese language Weight: 0.71 , language Weight: 0.63 , dialect Weight: 0.56 , villain Weight: 0.55 , note Weight: 0.54
Siblings	english language Weight: 0.35 , italian language Weight: 0.33 , old english Weight: 0.33 , lisp Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be more popular than cantonese	1.00
is popular	0.83
is expensive now	0.77
be considered harder than vietnamese	0.77
be than faster dynamic languages	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(language, is popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(language, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(language, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(english language, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(language, is popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(english language, is popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(english language, is popular)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese)

Similarity expansion

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(mandarin, is popular)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(mandarin, be considered harder than vietnamese)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(mandarin, is popular)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(mandarin, is popular)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(mandarin, is popular)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(mandarin, be considered harder than vietnamese)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(mandarin, be considered harder than vietnamese)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(mandarin, be considered harder than vietnamese)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(language, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(english language, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(mandarin, be more popular than cantonese) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(language, is popular)