lisp: be than faster dynamic languages

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.69
, programming language
Weight: 0.67
, tool
Weight: 0.54
, speech
Weight: 0.49
Siblings clojure
Weight: 0.44
, english language
Weight: 0.36
, italian language
Weight: 0.35
, accent
Weight: 0.35
, chinese language
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be than faster dynamic languages 1.00
be than faster other dynamic languages 0.99
be than dynamic languages 0.97
be than other dynamic languages 0.96
be than faster languages 0.96
be than faster other languages 0.95
be than languages 0.90
be than other languages 0.89
have many dialects 0.76
have dialects 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(lisp, be than dynamic languages)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(lisp, be than languages)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster other languages)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than dynamic languages)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(lisp, be than faster other languages)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster languages)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(lisp, be than faster languages)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than languages)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster other languages)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster languages)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(lisp, be than dynamic languages)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster languages)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster other languages)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(lisp, have dialects)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than other languages)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lisp, be than other languages)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(lisp, be than other languages)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than other languages)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(lisp, be than languages)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(lisp, have dialects)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(lisp, have dialects)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lisp, have many dialects)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than dynamic languages)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lisp, have many dialects)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(lisp, have many dialects)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than languages)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(lisp, have many dialects)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(lisp, have dialects)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)