mango: be soaked in water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.71
, flavor
Weight: 0.69
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.69
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.64
, dish
Weight: 0.64
Siblings coconut
Weight: 0.39
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38
, crab apple
Weight: 0.38
, pomegranate
Weight: 0.38
, coconut milk
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be soaked in water 1.00
is sprayed with water 0.83
be filled with water 0.81
is sprinkled with water 0.81
be sprinkled with water 0.81
were washed in 1950 0.80
soak up alcohol 0.79
is sprinkled with water at market 0.79
is water salty 0.79
be treated with hot water 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fruit, is sprinkled with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mango, be soaked in water)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fruit, be sprinkled with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mango, be soaked in water)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(fresh fruit, is sprinkled with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mango, be soaked in water)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(fresh fruit, be sprinkled with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mango, be soaked in water)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(dish, were washed in 1950) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mango, be soaked in water)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fruit, is sprinkled with water at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mango, be soaked in water)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(fresh fruit, is sprinkled with water at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mango, be soaked in water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, is sprinkled with water)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be sprinkled with water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, is sprinkled with water at market)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(fruit, be sprinkled with water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fruit, is sprinkled with water at market)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fruit, is sprinkled with water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(dish, were washed in 1950)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, is sprinkled with water)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be sprinkled with water)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fruit, is sprinkled with water)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be sprinkled with water)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(dish, were washed in 1950)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, is sprinkled with water at market)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fruit, is sprinkled with water at market)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(coconut, be filled with water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fruit, is sprinkled with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(mango, be soaked in water)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fruit, be sprinkled with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(mango, be soaked in water)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(fresh fruit, is sprinkled with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(mango, be soaked in water)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(fresh fruit, be sprinkled with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(mango, be soaked in water)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(dish, were washed in 1950) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(mango, be soaked in water)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fruit, is sprinkled with water at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(mango, be soaked in water)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(fresh fruit, is sprinkled with water at market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(mango, be soaked in water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(coconut, be filled with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(coconut, be filled with water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(mango, be soaked in water)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(mango, be treated with hot water)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(mango, be treated with hot water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(mango, be treated with hot water)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(mango, be treated with hot water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mango, be soaked in water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, is sprinkled with water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be sprinkled with water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fruit, is sprinkled with water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fruit, be sprinkled with water)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(dish, were washed in 1950)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, is sprinkled with water at market)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(fruit, is sprinkled with water at market)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(coconut, be filled with water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, is sprinkled with water)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be sprinkled with water)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, is sprinkled with water at market)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(fruit, is sprinkled with water at market)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fruit, be sprinkled with water)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(dish, were washed in 1950)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(mango, be soaked in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fruit, is sprinkled with water)