mango: be treated with hot water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.71
, flavor
Weight: 0.69
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.69
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.64
, dish
Weight: 0.64
Siblings coconut
Weight: 0.39
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38
, crab apple
Weight: 0.38
, pomegranate
Weight: 0.38
, coconut milk
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be treated with hot water 1.00
is hot water treated 0.99
be treated with water 0.94
is water 0.80
be soaked in water 0.78
be filled with water 0.78
is water pink 0.78
is sprayed with water 0.78
is water salty 0.78
have inside water 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(coconut, is water pink)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(coconut, have inside water)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(coconut, be filled with water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(coconut, be filled with water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(coconut, be filled with water)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(coconut, is water pink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(coconut, is water pink)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(coconut, have inside water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(coconut, have inside water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(mango, be treated with hot water)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(mango, is hot water treated)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(mango, is hot water treated)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(mango, is hot water treated)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(mango, be treated with water)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(mango, be treated with water)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(mango, be treated with water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(mango, be soaked in water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(mango, be soaked in water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mango, be soaked in water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mango, is hot water treated)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(mango, be treated with water)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mango, be soaked in water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(mango, be treated with hot water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(mango, be treated with hot water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(coconut, be filled with water)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(coconut, is water pink)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(mango, be treated with hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(coconut, have inside water)