mannequin: have scary mouths

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.62
, movie
Weight: 0.57
, film
Weight: 0.53
, object
Weight: 0.49
Siblings toy car
Weight: 0.33
, doll
Weight: 0.33
, lingerie
Weight: 0.33
, underwear
Weight: 0.33
, scarf
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have scary mouths 1.00
have scary open mouths 0.97
have open mouths 0.89
has physical part mouths 0.89
is scary 0.82
is inherently scary 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(movie, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(mannequin, have scary mouths)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(movie, is scary)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(movie, is scary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(doll, is scary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(movie, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mannequin, have scary mouths)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(doll, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(doll, is scary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(mannequin, have scary mouths)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(mannequin, have scary open mouths)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mannequin, have open mouths)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(mannequin, have scary open mouths)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(mannequin, has physical part mouths)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(mannequin, has physical part mouths)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(mannequin, have scary open mouths)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mannequin, has physical part mouths)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mannequin, have open mouths)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(mannequin, have open mouths)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, have scary open mouths)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mannequin, is scary)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(mannequin, is scary)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, has physical part mouths)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(mannequin, is inherently scary)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(mannequin, is scary)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mannequin, is inherently scary)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(mannequin, is inherently scary)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, is scary)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, is inherently scary)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, have open mouths)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, have scary mouths)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(mannequin, have scary mouths)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(movie, is scary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(doll, is scary)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(mannequin, have scary mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(movie, is scary)