mannequin: is inherently scary

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.62
, movie
Weight: 0.57
, film
Weight: 0.53
, object
Weight: 0.49
Siblings toy car
Weight: 0.33
, doll
Weight: 0.33
, lingerie
Weight: 0.33
, underwear
Weight: 0.33
, scarf
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is inherently scary 1.00
is scary 0.87
have scary mouths 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(movie, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mannequin, is inherently scary)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(mannequin, is inherently scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(movie, is scary)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, is inherently scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(movie, is scary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, is inherently scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(doll, is scary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(movie, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mannequin, is inherently scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(mannequin, is inherently scary)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(mannequin, is inherently scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(doll, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(doll, is scary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(mannequin, is inherently scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(mannequin, is inherently scary)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mannequin, is inherently scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, is scary)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(mannequin, is inherently scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mannequin, is scary)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mannequin, is inherently scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(mannequin, is scary)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(mannequin, is inherently scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(mannequin, is scary)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mannequin, is inherently scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, have scary mouths)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(mannequin, is inherently scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(mannequin, have scary mouths)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mannequin, is inherently scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(mannequin, have scary mouths)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(mannequin, is inherently scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mannequin, have scary mouths)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(mannequin, is inherently scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mannequin, is inherently scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, is inherently scary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(mannequin, is inherently scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mannequin, is inherently scary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, is inherently scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(movie, is scary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mannequin, is inherently scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(doll, is scary)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(mannequin, is inherently scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(movie, is scary)