mantle: melt at subduction zones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, player
Weight: 0.55
, star
Weight: 0.54
, legend
Weight: 0.50
, layer
Weight: 0.49
Siblings lithosphere
Weight: 0.46
, trophy
Weight: 0.31
, halo
Weight: 0.31
, aura
Weight: 0.31
, robe
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
melt at subduction zones 1.00
melt at zones 0.86
is called asthenosphere 0.80
have convection currents 0.78
melt 0.78
is convection 0.77
be hotter than crust 0.77
undergo convection 0.76
is molten 0.75
be more dense than crust 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(thing, melt)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(mantle, melt at subduction zones)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(thing, melt)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(thing, melt)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(thing, melt)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(mantle, melt at subduction zones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(mantle, melt at subduction zones)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(mantle, melt at zones)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(mantle, melt at zones)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(mantle, melt at zones)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(mantle, is called asthenosphere)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(mantle, melt)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(mantle, is called asthenosphere)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(mantle, is called asthenosphere)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(mantle, melt)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mantle, melt)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mantle, be hotter than crust)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mantle, be more dense than crust)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(mantle, be hotter than crust)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(mantle, be hotter than crust)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(mantle, melt at zones)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(mantle, be more dense than crust)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mantle, be more dense than crust)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(mantle, melt)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(mantle, is called asthenosphere)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(mantle, is molten)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mantle, undergo convection)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(mantle, is convection)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mantle, be hotter than crust)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(mantle, be more dense than crust)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(mantle, undergo convection)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(mantle, is molten)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(mantle, is convection)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(mantle, undergo convection)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mantle, have convection currents)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mantle, is molten)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(mantle, is convection)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mantle, undergo convection)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(mantle, is convection)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mantle, have convection currents)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mantle, is molten)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(mantle, have convection currents)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(mantle, have convection currents)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(mantle, melt at subduction zones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(mantle, melt at subduction zones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(thing, melt)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(mantle, melt at subduction zones)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(thing, melt)