manufacturing: was in south

Related concepts

Parents	business activity Weight: 0.67 , sector Weight: 0.67 , market Weight: 0.64 , industry Weight: 0.61
Siblings	chemical plant Weight: 0.71 , factory Weight: 0.66 , refining Weight: 0.53 , automobile industry Weight: 0.36 , banking industry Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was in south	1.00
be in north	0.95
is west	0.93
was in south in war	0.92
was slow in south	0.90
was in south in pre war	0.84
was in south in civil war	0.82
set up operations in northeast	0.81
is near	0.81
was in south in pre civil war	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(industry, set up operations in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(manufacturing, was in south)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(industry, was slow in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(manufacturing, was in south)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(industry, was slow in south)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(industry, set up operations in northeast)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(industry, was slow in south)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(industry, set up operations in northeast)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(factory, be in north)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(factory, is near)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(industry, set up operations in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(manufacturing, was in south)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(industry, was slow in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(manufacturing, was in south)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(factory, be in north) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(factory, be in north)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(factory, is near) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(factory, is near)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(manufacturing, was in south)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Salient(manufacturing, was in south in war)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south in war)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(manufacturing, was in south in war)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Salient(manufacturing, was in south in civil war)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(manufacturing, was in south in civil war)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south in civil war)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(manufacturing, was in south in war)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(manufacturing, was in south in pre civil war)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south in pre civil war)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Salient(manufacturing, was in south in pre war)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(manufacturing, was in south in civil war)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south in pre war)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(manufacturing, was in south in pre civil war)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(manufacturing, is west)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(manufacturing, is west)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(manufacturing, was in south in pre war)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, is west)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(manufacturing, was in south in pre civil war)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(manufacturing, is west)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(manufacturing, was in south in pre war)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(manufacturing, was in south)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(industry, was slow in south)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(industry, set up operations in northeast)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(factory, is near)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(factory, be in north)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(industry, was slow in south)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(manufacturing, was in south) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(industry, set up operations in northeast)