map: be better than ancient maps

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.62
, publication
Weight: 0.61
Siblings polygon
Weight: 0.50
, classifier
Weight: 0.48
, mercator projection
Weight: 0.46
, tau
Weight: 0.41
, seine
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than ancient maps 1.00
be better than maps 0.93
be called maps 0.87
be far more accurate than maps 0.87
be far more accurate than early maps 0.86
be from historical time period different from modern maps 0.85
be from time period different from modern maps 0.85
be from historical time period different from maps 0.83
be from time period different from maps 0.81
writing from ancient civilizations 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(artifact, writing from ancient civilizations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(map, be better than ancient maps)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(map, be better than ancient maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(artifact, writing from ancient civilizations)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(map, be better than ancient maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(artifact, writing from ancient civilizations)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(artifact, writing from ancient civilizations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(map, be better than ancient maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(map, be better than ancient maps)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(map, be better than ancient maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(map, be better than ancient maps)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(map, be better than ancient maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(map, be far more accurate than early maps)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(map, be better than ancient maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(map, be from historical time period different from modern maps)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(map, be better than ancient maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(map, be far more accurate than early maps)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(map, be better than ancient maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(map, be far more accurate than early maps)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(map, be better than ancient maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(map, be far more accurate than early maps)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(map, be better than ancient maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(map, be from historical time period different from modern maps)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(map, be better than ancient maps) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(map, be from historical time period different from modern maps)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(map, be better than ancient maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(map, be from historical time period different from modern maps)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(map, be better than ancient maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(map, be better than ancient maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(map, be better than ancient maps)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(map, be better than ancient maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(map, be better than ancient maps)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(map, be better than ancient maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(artifact, writing from ancient civilizations)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(map, be better than ancient maps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(artifact, writing from ancient civilizations)