map: be from historical time period different from modern maps

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.62
, publication
Weight: 0.61
Siblings polygon
Weight: 0.50
, classifier
Weight: 0.48
, mercator projection
Weight: 0.46
, tau
Weight: 0.41
, seine
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be from historical time period different from modern maps 1.00
be from historical time period different from maps 0.98
be from time period different from modern maps 0.97
be from historical time period different 0.94
be from time period different from maps 0.92
be from historical time period 0.92
be better than ancient maps 0.85
be from time period different 0.82
be far more accurate than early maps 0.82
be better than maps 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(map, be from historical time period different from modern maps)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(map, be from historical time period different from modern maps)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(map, be from historical time period different from modern maps)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(map, be better than ancient maps)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(map, be from historical time period different from modern maps)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(map, be better than ancient maps)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(map, be from historical time period different from modern maps)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(map, be better than ancient maps)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(map, be from historical time period different from modern maps)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(map, be far more accurate than early maps)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(map, be from historical time period different from modern maps)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(map, be far more accurate than early maps)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(map, be from historical time period different from modern maps)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(map, be far more accurate than early maps)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(map, be from historical time period different from modern maps)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(map, be far more accurate than early maps)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(map, be from historical time period different from modern maps)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(map, be better than ancient maps)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(map, be from historical time period different from modern maps)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(map, be from historical time period different from modern maps)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(map, be from historical time period different from modern maps)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(map, be from historical time period different from modern maps)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(map, be from historical time period different from modern maps)