maple tree: shed bark

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deciduous tree
Weight: 0.78
, tree
Weight: 0.77
, hardwood
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.42
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.42
, oak tree
Weight: 0.42
, apple tree
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
shed bark 1.00
lose bark 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, shed bark)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, shed bark)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, shed bark)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, lose bark)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(maple tree, shed bark)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(oak tree, shed bark)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(oak tree, shed bark)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(maple tree, shed bark)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(oak tree, lose bark)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(oak tree, lose bark)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(maple tree, shed bark)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(maple tree, shed bark)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(maple tree, shed bark)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(maple tree, lose bark)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(maple tree, shed bark)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, lose bark)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(maple tree, shed bark)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(maple tree, lose bark)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(maple tree, shed bark)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(maple tree, lose bark)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(maple tree, shed bark)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(maple tree, shed bark)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, shed bark)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(maple tree, shed bark)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(maple tree, shed bark)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, shed bark)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(oak tree, shed bark)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, shed bark)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(oak tree, lose bark)