maple: be canadian leaf

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hardwood
Weight: 0.74
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.70
, tree
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.64
, flavor
Weight: 0.63
Siblings maple tree
Weight: 0.41
, birch
Weight: 0.39
, oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, mahogany
Weight: 0.38
, oak
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be canadian leaf 1.00
be important to canada 0.77
is then chinese maple 0.77
is better then chinese maple 0.76
is chinese maple 0.76
is better chinese maple 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, be important to canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(maple tree, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(maple tree, be important to canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(maple, be canadian leaf)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(maple, be important to canada)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(maple, is then chinese maple)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(maple, is better then chinese maple)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(maple, is better chinese maple)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(maple, is chinese maple)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(maple, be important to canada)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(maple, is better chinese maple)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(maple, is better then chinese maple)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(maple, is chinese maple)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(maple, is then chinese maple)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(maple, be important to canada)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(maple, is chinese maple)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(maple, is better chinese maple)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(maple, is better then chinese maple)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(maple, is then chinese maple)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(maple, be important to canada)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(maple, is chinese maple)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(maple, is then chinese maple)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(maple, is better then chinese maple)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(maple, is better chinese maple)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(maple, be canadian leaf)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(maple, be canadian leaf)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(maple, be canadian leaf)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(maple tree, be important to canada)