maple: is maple

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hardwood
Weight: 0.74
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.70
, tree
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.64
, flavor
Weight: 0.63
Siblings maple tree
Weight: 0.41
, birch
Weight: 0.39
, oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, mahogany
Weight: 0.38
, oak
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is maple 1.00
is chinese maple 0.92
is then chinese maple 0.90
is better chinese maple 0.90
is better then chinese maple 0.89
is wood 0.79
is good wood 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(maple, is maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(oak, is good wood)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(maple, is maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(oak, is wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(maple, is maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(oak, is wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(oak, is wood)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(maple, is maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(oak, is good wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(oak, is good wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(maple, is maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(maple, is maple)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(maple, is maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(maple, is chinese maple)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(maple, is maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(maple, is then chinese maple)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(maple, is maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(maple, is better chinese maple)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(maple, is maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(maple, is better then chinese maple)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(maple, is maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(maple, is wood)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(maple, is maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(maple, is maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(maple, is maple)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(maple, is maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(maple, is maple)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(maple, is maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(oak, is wood)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(maple, is maple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(oak, is good wood)