marketing: be different from conventional marketing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.65
, department
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
, business
Weight: 0.60
Siblings advertising agency
Weight: 0.66
, planning
Weight: 0.34
, manager
Weight: 0.33
, accounting firm
Weight: 0.33
, engineering
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from conventional marketing 1.00
be different from desktop marketing 0.82
be different marketing to girls 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(marketing, be different from conventional marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(marketing, be different from conventional marketing)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(marketing, be different from conventional marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(marketing, be different from desktop marketing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(marketing, be different from conventional marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(marketing, be different marketing to girls)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(marketing, be different from conventional marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be different from desktop marketing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(marketing, be different from conventional marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(marketing, be different from desktop marketing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(marketing, be different from conventional marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(marketing, be different from desktop marketing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(marketing, be different from conventional marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(marketing, be different marketing to girls)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(marketing, be different from conventional marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(marketing, be different marketing to girls)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(marketing, be different from conventional marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be different marketing to girls)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(marketing, be different from conventional marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(marketing, be different from conventional marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be different from conventional marketing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(marketing, be different from conventional marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(marketing, be different from conventional marketing)