marketing: help business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.65
, department
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
, business
Weight: 0.60
Siblings advertising agency
Weight: 0.66
, planning
Weight: 0.34
, manager
Weight: 0.33
, accounting firm
Weight: 0.33
, engineering
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
help business 1.00
be to business 0.91
be for business 0.91
be in business 0.91
help small-scale businesses 0.90
help businesses 0.90
really is important to business 0.83
be important to businesses 0.82
be important to small businesses 0.81
be important to success of business 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(partner, be to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(marketing, help business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(marketing, help business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(partner, be to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(marketing, help business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(partner, be to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(partner, be to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(marketing, help business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(marketing, help business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(marketing, help business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(marketing, help business)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(marketing, help business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be to business)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(marketing, help business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be for business)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(marketing, help business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(marketing, be in business)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(marketing, help business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(marketing, be in business)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(marketing, help business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(marketing, be to business)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(marketing, help business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(marketing, help business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(marketing, help business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(marketing, help business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(marketing, help business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(marketing, help business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(partner, be to business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(marketing, help business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(partner, be to business)