marmite: is terrible

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.51
, yeast
Weight: 0.50
, product
Weight: 0.45
, stuff
Weight: 0.44
Siblings pepsi
Weight: 0.32
, oreo
Weight: 0.32
, subaru
Weight: 0.31
, burberry
Weight: 0.31
, hermes
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is terrible 1.00
is disgusting 0.79
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(marmite, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(subaru, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(marmite, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(marmite, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(subaru, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(subaru, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(marmite, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(marmite, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(marmite, is terrible)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(marmite, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(marmite, is disgusting)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(marmite, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(marmite, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(marmite, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(marmite, is disgusting)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(marmite, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(marmite, is disgusting)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(marmite, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(marmite, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(marmite, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(marmite, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(marmite, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(marmite, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(marmite, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(marmite, is disgusting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(marmite, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(marmite, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(marmite, is terrible)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(marmite, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(marmite, is terrible)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(marmite, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(subaru, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(marmite, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oreo, has quality bad)