marsh: be used to frog to live in

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents habitat
Weight: 0.64
, shallow water
Weight: 0.64
, lake
Weight: 0.59
, water
Weight: 0.59
, company
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ocean water
Weight: 0.36
, pond
Weight: 0.35
, great salt lake
Weight: 0.35
, sea water
Weight: 0.35
, coral reef
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to frog to live in 1.00
be used to frog tank 0.87
be used to bird to live in 0.86
be used to fish to live in 0.82
be full of duck and fish 0.77
be at bird bath 0.76
be used to fish in 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(shallow water, be used to frog tank)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(lake, be used to fish to live in)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(lake, be used to fish in)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(marsh, be used to frog to live in)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(shallow water, be used to frog tank)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(lake, be used to fish to live in)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(lake, be used to fish in)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(shallow water, be used to frog tank)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lake, be used to fish to live in)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lake, be used to fish in)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pond, be full of duck and fish)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(shallow water, be used to frog tank)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(lake, be used to fish to live in)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(lake, be used to fish in)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(marsh, be used to frog to live in)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pond, be full of duck and fish)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(pond, be full of duck and fish)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(marsh, be used to frog to live in)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(marsh, be used to bird to live in)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(marsh, be used to bird to live in)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(marsh, be used to bird to live in)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be used to bird to live in)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be used to frog to live in)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(marsh, be used to frog to live in)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lake, be used to fish to live in)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(lake, be used to fish in)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(shallow water, be used to frog tank)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pond, be full of duck and fish)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lake, be used to fish to live in)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(shallow water, be used to frog tank)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(marsh, be used to frog to live in)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(lake, be used to fish in)