mason: is dixon line important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.65
, man
Weight: 0.64
, construction worker
Weight: 0.63
, craftsman
Weight: 0.60
Siblings carpenter
Weight: 0.38
, painter
Weight: 0.36
, roofer
Weight: 0.35
, bricklayer
Weight: 0.35
, electrician
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dixon line important 1.00
is dixon line 0.97
is line important 0.84
has shape line 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mason, is dixon line important)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(painter, has shape line)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mason, is dixon line important)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(painter, has shape line)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(painter, has shape line)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mason, is dixon line important)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(mason, is dixon line important)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(mason, is dixon line important)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mason, is dixon line)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(mason, is dixon line important)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(mason, is dixon line)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mason, is dixon line important)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(mason, is dixon line)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(mason, is dixon line important)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mason, is dixon line)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(mason, is dixon line important)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mason, is line important)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(mason, is dixon line important)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(mason, is line important)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mason, is dixon line important)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(mason, is line important)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(mason, is dixon line important)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mason, is line important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(mason, is dixon line important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mason, is dixon line important)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mason, is dixon line important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mason, is dixon line important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mason, is dixon line important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mason, is dixon line important)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(painter, has shape line)