massachusetts: was colony

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, new england
Weight: 0.65
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.63
, connecticut
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.64
, boston
Weight: 0.62
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, maryland
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was colony 1.00
is colony 0.99
was important colony 0.98
is best colony 0.94
was founded as colony 0.88
be better than colonies 0.84
was better than rest of colonies 0.82
be better than other colonies 0.81
was colonized 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(connecticut, is colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was colony)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(connecticut, is best colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was colony)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was colony)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(pennsylvania, be better than other colonies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was colony)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pennsylvania, was colonized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was colony)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is colony)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was colonized)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is best colony)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is best colony)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, be better than other colonies)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best colony)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is best colony)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, be better than other colonies)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was colonized)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is colony)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is colony)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be better than other colonies)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was colonized)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was colonized)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best colony)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is colony)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new york city, was colonized)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(connecticut, is colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was colony)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(connecticut, is best colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was colony)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was colony)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(pennsylvania, be better than other colonies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was colony)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pennsylvania, was colonized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was colony)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(new hampshire, is colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is colony)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(maryland, is colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(maryland, is colony)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best colony)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(new york city, was colonized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(new york city, was colonized)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(new hampshire, was colonized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was colonized)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(maryland, be better than other colonies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(maryland, be better than other colonies)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(maryland, was colonized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(maryland, was colonized)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was colony)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was important colony)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best colony)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was founded as colony)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be better than colonies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was better than rest of colonies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be better than other colonies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was colonized)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be better than colonies)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was better than rest of colonies)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was colonized)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(massachusetts, is best colony)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(massachusetts, be better than colonies)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be better than colonies)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was founded as colony)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was colonized)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was important colony)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was better than rest of colonies)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was better than rest of colonies)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is best colony)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best colony)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was founded as colony)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was founded as colony)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(massachusetts, be better than other colonies)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be better than other colonies)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was important colony)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be better than other colonies)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was important colony)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was colony)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(connecticut, is colony)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was colonized)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best colony)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(connecticut, is best colony)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be better than other colonies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is colony)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(maryland, is colony)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(new york city, was colonized)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was colonized)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best colony)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(maryland, was colonized)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(maryland, be better than other colonies)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(connecticut, is colony)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was colonized)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best colony)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(connecticut, is best colony)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(massachusetts, was colony) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be better than other colonies)