:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(method, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massage, work)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(modality, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massage, work)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(gift, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massage, work)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(gift, giving work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massage, work)
...
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(gift, work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(modality, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(method, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(gift, giving work)
...
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(gift, work)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(modality, work)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gift, giving work)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(method, work)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(method, acting work)
...
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(reflexology, work)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, work)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, work)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(yoga, work)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(method, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(massage, work)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(gift, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(massage, work)
...
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(yoga, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(yoga, work)
Salient implies Plausible
0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(massage, work)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massage, work)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(gift, work)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(modality, work)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(method, work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(gift, giving work)
...
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(chiropractic, work)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(acupuncture, work)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(yoga, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(reflexology, work)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(gift, work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(modality, work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(method, work)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(massage, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(gift, giving work)
...