master: be in mechanical engineering

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents title
Weight: 0.64
, degree
Weight: 0.62
, teacher
Weight: 0.61
, film
Weight: 0.60
Siblings stephen king
Weight: 0.63
, edward weston
Weight: 0.52
, frank stella
Weight: 0.52
, realist
Weight: 0.36
, instructor
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in mechanical engineering 1.00
be in engineering 0.91
engineering 0.91
be in chemical engineering 0.88
be in civil engineering 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(master, be in mechanical engineering)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(master, be in mechanical engineering)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(master, be in mechanical engineering)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(master, be in engineering)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(master, be in mechanical engineering)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(master, engineering)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(master, be in mechanical engineering)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(master, be in chemical engineering)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(master, be in mechanical engineering)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(master, be in engineering)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(master, be in mechanical engineering)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(master, engineering)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(master, be in mechanical engineering)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(master, be in civil engineering)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(master, be in mechanical engineering)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(master, be in chemical engineering)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(master, be in mechanical engineering)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(master, be in engineering)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(master, be in mechanical engineering)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(master, engineering)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(master, be in mechanical engineering)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(master, engineering)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(master, be in mechanical engineering)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(master, be in engineering)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(master, be in mechanical engineering)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(master, be in civil engineering)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(master, be in mechanical engineering)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(master, be in chemical engineering)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(master, be in mechanical engineering)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(master, be in chemical engineering)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(master, be in mechanical engineering)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(master, be in civil engineering)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(master, be in mechanical engineering)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(master, be in civil engineering)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(master, be in mechanical engineering)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(master, be in mechanical engineering)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(master, be in mechanical engineering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(master, be in mechanical engineering)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(master, be in mechanical engineering)