mathematics: be important to engineers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.73
, computer science
Weight: 0.72
, math
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.64
, philosophy
Weight: 0.64
Siblings physics
Weight: 0.37
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.37
, biology
Weight: 0.37
, arithmetic
Weight: 0.37
, metaphysics
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to engineers 1.00
be used in engineering 0.79
be important in chemical engineering 0.79
be important to scientists 0.79
be used in electrical engineering 0.78
be important tool for scientists 0.77
relate to computer engineering 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(math, be used in engineering)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to engineers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(math, be used in engineering)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be used in engineering)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(math, be used in engineering)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(mathematics, be important to engineers)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(mathematics, be used in engineering)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(mathematics, be used in electrical engineering)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be used in electrical engineering)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be used in engineering)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(mathematics, be used in electrical engineering)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(mathematics, be used in engineering)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(mathematics, be important in chemical engineering)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(mathematics, relate to computer engineering)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mathematics, relate to computer engineering)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be used in electrical engineering)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(mathematics, relate to computer engineering)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important in chemical engineering)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important in chemical engineering)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(mathematics, be important to scientists)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important in chemical engineering)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to scientists)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(mathematics, be important tool for scientists)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important tool for scientists)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be used in engineering)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, relate to computer engineering)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important to scientists)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to scientists)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important tool for scientists)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important tool for scientists)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to engineers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(math, be used in engineering)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(math, be used in engineering)