mayor: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents member
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.63
, position
Weight: 0.61
, official
Weight: 0.59
Siblings governor
Weight: 0.35
, congressman
Weight: 0.34
, policeman
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
is paid 0.96
get paid little 0.93
is paid little 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mayor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(congressman, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mayor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(congressman, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(congressman, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mayor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(mayor, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mayor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(mayor, is paid)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mayor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mayor, get paid little)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mayor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(mayor, is paid little)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mayor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mayor, is paid)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mayor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mayor, is paid)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mayor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mayor, get paid little)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mayor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(mayor, get paid little)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mayor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mayor, is paid little)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mayor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mayor, is paid little)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mayor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mayor, is paid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mayor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mayor, get paid little)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mayor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mayor, is paid little)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(mayor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mayor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mayor, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mayor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mayor, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mayor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(congressman, get paid)