mayor: get paid little

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents member
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.63
, position
Weight: 0.61
, official
Weight: 0.59
Siblings governor
Weight: 0.35
, congressman
Weight: 0.34
, policeman
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid little 1.00
is paid little 0.98
get paid 0.93
is paid 0.88
make little money 0.86
make money 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mayor, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(congressman, make money)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mayor, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(congressman, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mayor, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(congressman, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(congressman, get paid)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mayor, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(congressman, make money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(congressman, make money)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mayor, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mayor, get paid little)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(mayor, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(mayor, is paid little)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(mayor, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mayor, is paid little)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(mayor, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(mayor, get paid)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mayor, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mayor, is paid little)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(mayor, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mayor, is paid little)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(mayor, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mayor, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mayor, get paid little)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mayor, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mayor, get paid little)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mayor, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(congressman, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mayor, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(congressman, make money)