mcdonald: be big success

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be big success 1.00
has state success 0.91
be big 0.82
is most successful 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mcdonald, be big success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(mcdonald, be big success)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(mcdonald, be big success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(mcdonald, be big)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mcdonald, be big success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(mcdonald, be big)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mcdonald, be big success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, be big)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(mcdonald, be big success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is most successful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mcdonald, be big success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(mcdonald, is most successful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mcdonald, be big success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, is most successful)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(mcdonald, be big success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be big)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(mcdonald, be big success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is most successful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mcdonald, be big success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(mcdonald, be big success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be big success)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mcdonald, be big success) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(mcdonald, be big success)