mcdonald: is most successful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is most successful 1.00
be big success 0.78
has state success 0.76
is popular 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is most successful)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food chain, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is most successful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(mcdonald, is most successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food chain, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(mcdonald, is most successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is most successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is popular)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is most successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mcdonald, is most successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, is most successful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food chain, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mcdonald, is most successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, is most successful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(mcdonald, is most successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(mcdonald, is most successful)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(mcdonald, is most successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(mcdonald, be big success)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(mcdonald, is most successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(mcdonald, be big success)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(mcdonald, is most successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, be big success)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mcdonald, is most successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be big success)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(mcdonald, is most successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is most successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is most successful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(mcdonald, is most successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is most successful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is most successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food chain, is popular)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is most successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(mcdonald, is most successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food chain, is popular)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(mcdonald, is most successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is popular)