mcdonald: has best fast food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has best fast food 1.00
has food 0.84
throw away good food 0.77
has quality good 0.76
throw out food 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has best fast food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chain, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has best fast food)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(restaurant, throw out food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has best fast food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(restaurant, throw out food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chain, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, throw out food)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(chain, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has best fast food)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chain, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has best fast food)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(restaurant, throw out food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has best fast food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(mcdonalds, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has best fast food)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has best fast food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has best fast food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(restaurant, throw out food)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(chain, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(restaurant, throw out food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(chain, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(mcdonald, has best fast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)