mcdonald: has food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has food 1.00
has best fast food 0.84
be different than food web 0.79
buy food in bulk 0.78
form food web 0.78
throw out food 0.77
put food on napkins 0.77
work in food courts 0.76
be related to food webs 0.75
has chicken 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(food chain, form food web) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(food chain, be different than food web) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has food)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(restaurant, throw out food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food chain, be related to food webs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(restaurant, throw out food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(food chain, be different than food web)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(food chain, be related to food webs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(food chain, form food web)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, throw out food)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(food chain, form food web)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be different than food web)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be related to food webs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(food chain, be different than food web) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(food chain, form food web) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(restaurant, throw out food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has food)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food chain, be related to food webs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has food)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has chicken)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has chicken)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has chicken)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has best fast food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has chicken)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has best fast food)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has best fast food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has best fast food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(food chain, be different than food web)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(food chain, be related to food webs)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(food chain, form food web)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(restaurant, throw out food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(food chain, be different than food web)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(food chain, be related to food webs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(food chain, form food web)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mcdonald, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(restaurant, throw out food)