mcdonald: has chicken

Related concepts

Parents	food chain Weight: 0.65 , restaurant Weight: 0.62 , fast food restaurant Weight: 0.62 , chain Weight: 0.62 , fast food chain Weight: 0.61
Siblings	mcdonalds Weight: 0.37 , italian restaurant Weight: 0.36 , chinese restaurant Weight: 0.35 , mexican restaurant Weight: 0.35 , indian restaurant Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has chicken	1.00
has chicken nuggets	0.83
primarily use breaded shrimp	0.79
be fried rice yellow	0.78
has eggs	0.78
put pickle on top of burgers	0.78
fried better rice taste	0.78
serve dog meat	0.78
leave tail on shrimp	0.77
beef good taste	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(restaurant, leave tail on shrimp) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(mcdonald, has chicken)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(restaurant, leave tail on shrimp)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, leave tail on shrimp)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be fried rice yellow)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, serve dog meat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(restaurant, leave tail on shrimp) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has chicken)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(chinese restaurant, serve dog meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, serve dog meat)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be fried rice yellow) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be fried rice yellow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Salient(mcdonald, has chicken)

Similarity expansion

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has eggs)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(mcdonald, has eggs)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has eggs)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.27

Typical(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.27

Typical(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(mcdonald, has eggs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has chicken)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(mcdonald, has chicken)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(restaurant, leave tail on shrimp)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, serve dog meat)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be fried rice yellow)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.27

Typical(mcdonald, has chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(restaurant, leave tail on shrimp)