mcdonald: has chicken nuggets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has chicken nuggets 1.00
has nuggets 0.94
has chicken 0.83
spit in burgers 0.76
put pickle on top of burgers 0.75
has apple slices 0.75
has patties 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has chicken)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has chicken)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has chicken)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has nuggets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has chicken)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has apple slices)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has apple slices)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has apple slices)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has nuggets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has apple slices)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has nuggets)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has nuggets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)