mcdonald: has apple slices

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has apple slices 1.00
has apple pies 0.87
has apples 0.82
serve celery with wings 0.78
get pan pizza edges 0.76
serve unsalted butter 0.76
put butter on steaks 0.76
has chicken nuggets 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonald, has apple slices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has apple slices)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mcdonald, has apple slices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has apple pies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(mcdonald, has apple slices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has apple pies)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonald, has apple slices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has apple pies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mcdonald, has apple slices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has apples)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(mcdonald, has apple slices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has apples)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonald, has apple slices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has apples)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mcdonald, has apple slices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(mcdonald, has apple slices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(mcdonald, has apple slices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has apple pies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonald, has apple slices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(mcdonald, has apple slices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has apples)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(mcdonald, has apple slices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has chicken nuggets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(mcdonald, has apple slices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has apple slices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has apple slices)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonald, has apple slices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has apple slices)