mcdonald: has apple pies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has apple pies 1.00
has apple slices 0.87
has apples 0.84
put pickle on top of burgers 0.79
give pickles 0.79
has cookies 0.79
has buns 0.78
call pancakes hotcakes 0.77
spit in burgers 0.77
fried better rice taste 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has apple pies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(mcdonald, has apple pies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, spit in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(mcdonald, has apple pies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has apple pies)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mcdonald, has apple pies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has apple slices)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(mcdonald, has apple pies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has apple slices)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(mcdonald, has apple pies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has apple slices)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mcdonald, has apple pies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has apples)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(mcdonald, has apple pies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has apples)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(mcdonald, has apple pies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has apples)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(mcdonald, has apple pies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has apple slices)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(mcdonald, has apple pies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has apples)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mcdonald, has apple pies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has cookies)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(mcdonald, has apple pies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has cookies)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(mcdonald, has apple pies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has cookies)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(mcdonald, has apple pies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has cookies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(mcdonald, has apple pies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has apple pies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has apple pies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(mcdonald, has apple pies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has apple pies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has apple pies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)