mcdonald: has red

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has red 1.00
has use red 0.95
has color red 0.93
has yellow 0.90
has color yellow 0.87
has use yellow 0.86
have black lights 0.76
has state dark 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(restaurant, has color red)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has red)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has color red)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has red)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(restaurant, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has red)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has red)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(chain, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has red)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(food chain, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has red)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(restaurant, have black lights)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has red)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(restaurant, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has red)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has color red)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(restaurant, has color red)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(food chain, has color yellow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(chain, has color yellow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has color yellow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(restaurant, has color yellow)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(restaurant, has state dark)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(restaurant, have black lights)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has color red)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(food chain, has color yellow)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chain, has color yellow)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has color yellow)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, has color red)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, has color yellow)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, has state dark)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, have black lights)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, has color yellow)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, has color yellow)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, has color red)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(restaurant, has color red)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has color red)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(restaurant, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(chain, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(food chain, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(restaurant, have black lights)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(restaurant, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has red)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(mcdonalds, has color red)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, has color red)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(mcdonalds, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, has color yellow)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, has color yellow)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, has color yellow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has red)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has yellow)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has use red)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has yellow)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has color red)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has yellow)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has yellow)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has use red)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has use yellow)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has use red)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has color yellow)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has use yellow)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has color red)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has color red)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has use yellow)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has color yellow)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use yellow)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has color yellow)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has color yellow)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has color red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has color red)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, has color red)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(food chain, has color yellow)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chain, has color yellow)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has color yellow)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, has color yellow)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(restaurant, has state dark)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, have black lights)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, has color red)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, has color yellow)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, has color yellow)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has color red)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, has color red)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(food chain, has color yellow)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chain, has color yellow)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has color yellow)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, has color yellow)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(restaurant, has state dark)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mcdonald, has red)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, have black lights)