mcdonald: has use red

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has use red 1.00
has red 0.95
has use yellow 0.93
has color red 0.90
has yellow 0.87
has color yellow 0.85
has use 0.84
use certain colors 0.76
use white plates 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(restaurant, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has use red)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has use red)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(restaurant, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has use red)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has use red)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(chain, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has use red)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(food chain, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has use red)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has color red)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(restaurant, has color red)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(food chain, has color yellow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(chain, has color yellow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has color yellow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(restaurant, has color yellow)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(food chain, has color yellow)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chain, has color yellow)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has color yellow)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has color red)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, has color yellow)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, has color red)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, has color yellow)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, has color yellow)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, has color red)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(restaurant, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has use red)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has use red)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(restaurant, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has use red)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has use red)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(chain, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has use red)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(food chain, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has use red)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(mcdonalds, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, has color red)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(mcdonalds, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, has color yellow)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, has color yellow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has use red)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has use yellow)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has red)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has yellow)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has use)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has red)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has use yellow)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has use yellow)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has red)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use yellow)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has yellow)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has yellow)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has use)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has yellow)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has color red)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has color red)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has use)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has red)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has color yellow)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has color red)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has color yellow)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has color yellow)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has color yellow)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has color red)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has use red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has color red)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, has color red)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(food chain, has color yellow)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chain, has color yellow)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has color yellow)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, has color yellow)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, has color yellow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, has color red)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, has color yellow)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has color red)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, has color red)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(food chain, has color yellow)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chain, has color yellow)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has color yellow)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mcdonald, has use red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, has color yellow)