mcdonald: has spoons

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has spoons 1.00
has mcflurry spoons 1.00
has ice cream spoons 0.91
has mcflurry spoon 0.84
use plastic cups 0.76
has use styrofoam cups for tea 0.76
using styrofoam cups 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has spoons)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has mcflurry spoons)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has mcflurry spoons)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has ice cream spoons)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has ice cream spoons)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has ice cream spoons)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has mcflurry spoons)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has mcflurry spoon)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has mcflurry spoon)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has mcflurry spoon)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has ice cream spoons)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use styrofoam cups for tea)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, using styrofoam cups)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has mcflurry spoons)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(mcdonald, using styrofoam cups)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has use styrofoam cups for tea)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, using styrofoam cups)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has mcflurry spoon)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has use styrofoam cups for tea)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(mcdonald, using styrofoam cups)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has use styrofoam cups for tea)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has spoons)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(mcdonald, has spoons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has spoons)