meat: be marinated in wine

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lunch meat
Weight: 0.80
, hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, chicken
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be marinated in wine 1.00
is cooked 0.79
be cooked 0.79
is delicious 0.78
cooked to raw 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(meat, be marinated in wine)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fast food, is delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(meat, be marinated in wine)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fast food, is delicious)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is delicious)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is delicious)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is delicious)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beef, be cooked)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be cooked)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(meat, be marinated in wine)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fast food, is delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(meat, be marinated in wine)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(beef, be cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(beef, be cooked)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(lamb, be cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(lamb, be cooked)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(meat, be marinated in wine)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(meat, is cooked)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(meat, be cooked)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(meat, be cooked)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(meat, is cooked)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(meat, cooked to raw)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(meat, be cooked)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(meat, cooked to raw)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(meat, is cooked)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(meat, is delicious)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(meat, is delicious)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(meat, is delicious)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(meat, cooked to raw)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(meat, is delicious)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(meat, cooked to raw)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(meat, be cooked)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(meat, is cooked)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(meat, be marinated in wine)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(meat, be marinated in wine)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fast food, is delicious)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is delicious)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(beef, be cooked)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(lamb, be cooked)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fast food, is delicious)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(meat, be marinated in wine) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is delicious)