meat: be serve at restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.63
Siblings hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, pork
Weight: 0.68
, tofu
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be serve at restaurant 1.00
be serve in restaurant 1.00
be at fast-food restaurant 0.89
be at restaurant 0.89
be at in restaurant 0.89
be find in restaurant 0.88
be serve at steakhouse 0.88
be serve in chinese restaurant 0.87
be used to waiter to serve 0.85
be sell in fast-food restaurant 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meat, be serve at restaurant)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meat, be serve at restaurant)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meat, be serve at restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meat, be serve at restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meat, be serve at restaurant)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(beef, be serve in chinese restaurant)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be sell in fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(meat, be serve at restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(meat, be serve at restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(meat, be serve at restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(meat, be serve at restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(meat, be serve at restaurant)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hamburger, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hamburger, be sell in fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be sell in fast-food restaurant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(beef, be serve in chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(beef, be serve in chinese restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(meat, be serve at restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(meat, be serve at steakhouse)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(meat, be serve at steakhouse)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(meat, be serve at steakhouse)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(meat, be used to waiter to serve)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(meat, be used to waiter to serve)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meat, be serve at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hamburger, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hamburger, be sell in fast-food restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beef, be serve in chinese restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(meat, be serve at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
...