meat: be with protein good for humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lunch meat
Weight: 0.80
, hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, chicken
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with protein good for humans 1.00
have protein 0.93
is protein 0.92
be good for humans 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(beef, have protein)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have protein)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(hamburger, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hamburger, have protein)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(beef, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(beef, have protein)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(meat, be with protein good for humans)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(meat, have protein)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(meat, is protein)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(meat, is protein)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(meat, is protein)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(meat, have protein)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(meat, have protein)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(meat, be good for humans)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(meat, be good for humans)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(meat, is protein)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(meat, be good for humans)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(meat, be good for humans)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(meat, have protein)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(meat, be with protein good for humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(meat, be with protein good for humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(hamburger, have protein)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(meat, be with protein good for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(beef, have protein)