meat: have protein

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lunch meat
Weight: 0.80
, hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, chicken
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
have protein 1.00
is protein 0.99
be with protein good for humans 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(meat, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(beef, have protein)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(meat, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have protein)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(hamburger, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hamburger, have protein)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(beef, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(beef, have protein)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(meat, have protein)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(meat, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(meat, is protein)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(meat, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(meat, be with protein good for humans)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(meat, is protein)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(meat, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(meat, be with protein good for humans)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(meat, be with protein good for humans)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(meat, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(meat, is protein)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(meat, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(meat, is protein)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(meat, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(meat, be with protein good for humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(meat, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(meat, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(meat, have protein)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(meat, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(meat, have protein)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(meat, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(hamburger, have protein)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(meat, have protein) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(beef, have protein)