mechanic: have big forearms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents specialist
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.60
, guy
Weight: 0.60
, element
Weight: 0.59
, expert
Weight: 0.59
Siblings carpenter
Weight: 0.35
, old man
Weight: 0.35
, engineer
Weight: 0.34
, foreman
Weight: 0.34
, policeman
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have big forearms 1.00
has physical part forearms 0.96
have big hands 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, have big forearms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, have big hands)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mechanic, have big forearms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(carpenter, have big hands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(carpenter, have big hands)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mechanic, have big forearms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(mechanic, have big forearms)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(mechanic, have big forearms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mechanic, have big hands)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mechanic, have big forearms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mechanic, have big hands)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(mechanic, have big forearms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(mechanic, have big hands)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(mechanic, have big forearms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, have big hands)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(mechanic, have big forearms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mechanic, have big forearms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, have big forearms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mechanic, have big forearms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mechanic, have big forearms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, have big forearms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(carpenter, have big hands)