mechanic: have big hands

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents specialist
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.60
, guy
Weight: 0.60
, element
Weight: 0.59
, expert
Weight: 0.59
Siblings carpenter
Weight: 0.35
, old man
Weight: 0.35
, engineer
Weight: 0.34
, foreman
Weight: 0.34
, policeman
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have big hands 1.00
has hands 0.91
has physical part hands 0.87
have big forearms 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, have big hands)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(old man, has hands)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, has physical part hands)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(carpenter, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(carpenter, have big hands)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(old man, has hands)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(old man, has hands)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(carpenter, has physical part hands)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(carpenter, has physical part hands)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(mechanic, have big hands)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(mechanic, has hands)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(mechanic, has hands)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mechanic, has hands)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(mechanic, has physical part hands)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(mechanic, has physical part hands)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(mechanic, has physical part hands)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mechanic, have big forearms)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(mechanic, have big forearms)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mechanic, have big forearms)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, have big forearms)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, has hands)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, has physical part hands)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, have big hands)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mechanic, have big hands)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(carpenter, has physical part hands)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(old man, has hands)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, have big hands)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(carpenter, have big hands)