mechanic: need maths

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents specialist
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.60
, guy
Weight: 0.60
, element
Weight: 0.59
, expert
Weight: 0.59
Siblings carpenter
Weight: 0.35
, old man
Weight: 0.35
, engineer
Weight: 0.34
, foreman
Weight: 0.34
, policeman
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
need maths 1.00
use math 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mechanic, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use math)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mechanic, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(carpenter, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mechanic, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(mechanic, need maths)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(mechanic, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(mechanic, use math)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(mechanic, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(mechanic, use math)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mechanic, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(mechanic, use math)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(mechanic, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, use math)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(mechanic, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(mechanic, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, need maths)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mechanic, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(mechanic, need maths)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(engineer, use math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(carpenter, use math)