median: be funny in single data set

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents measure
Weight: 0.58
, estimate
Weight: 0.52
, percentile
Weight: 0.52
, distribution
Weight: 0.50
, value
Weight: 0.50
Siblings increase
Weight: 0.30
, equity
Weight: 0.30
, comparison
Weight: 0.29
, variance
Weight: 0.29
, projection
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be funny in single data set 1.00
be funny in data set 0.96
be used for data 0.83
be determined both in data 0.82
be reduced in data sets 0.81
be reduced in large data sets 0.80
best represent data 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(variance, be reduced in data sets)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(variance, be reduced in large data sets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(variance, be reduced in data sets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(variance, be reduced in data sets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(variance, be reduced in large data sets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(variance, be reduced in large data sets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(median, be funny in single data set)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(median, be funny in data set)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(median, be funny in data set)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(median, be funny in data set)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(median, be used for data)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(median, be determined both in data)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(median, be used for data)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(median, be funny in data set)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(median, be determined both in data)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(median, be used for data)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(median, be determined both in data)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(median, best represent data)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(median, best represent data)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(median, best represent data)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(median, be determined both in data)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(median, be used for data)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(median, best represent data)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(median, be funny in single data set)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(median, be funny in single data set)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(variance, be reduced in data sets)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(median, be funny in single data set) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(variance, be reduced in large data sets)