medusa: was dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents character
Weight: 0.63
, monster
Weight: 0.63
, boss
Weight: 0.48
, thing
Weight: 0.46
, god
Weight: 0.42
Siblings creature
Weight: 0.35
, spider man
Weight: 0.34
, dragon
Weight: 0.34
, hydra
Weight: 0.34
, cyclops
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was dangerous 1.00
is dangerous 0.97
was scary 0.82
was worhshiped 0.76
was cruel 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cyclops, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(cyclops, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(cyclops, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(medusa, was dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(medusa, is dangerous)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(medusa, was worhshiped)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(medusa, is dangerous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(medusa, is dangerous)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(medusa, is dangerous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(medusa, was worhshiped)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(medusa, was scary)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(medusa, was worhshiped)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(medusa, was scary)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(medusa, was scary)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(medusa, was scary)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(medusa, was cruel)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(medusa, was cruel)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(medusa, was cruel)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(medusa, was cruel)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(medusa, was worhshiped)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(medusa, was dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(medusa, was dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(medusa, was dangerous)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cyclops, is dangerous)