melbourne: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents club
Weight: 0.61
, port
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.55
, new zealand
Weight: 0.55
Siblings liverpool
Weight: 0.35
, manchester
Weight: 0.35
, sydney
Weight: 0.34
, tasmania
Weight: 0.34
, brisbane
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is transport expensive 0.83
is bitter expensive 0.82
is public transport expensive 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(sydney, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(brisbane, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(melbourne, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(brisbane, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(brisbane, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(melbourne, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(sydney, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(sydney, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(melbourne, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(melbourne, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(melbourne, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(melbourne, is bitter expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(melbourne, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(melbourne, is bitter expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(melbourne, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is bitter expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(melbourne, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(melbourne, is bitter expensive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(melbourne, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(melbourne, is transport expensive)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(melbourne, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(melbourne, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(melbourne, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(melbourne, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(brisbane, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sydney, is expensive)