melbourne: is good city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents club
Weight: 0.61
, port
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.55
, new zealand
Weight: 0.55
Siblings liverpool
Weight: 0.35
, manchester
Weight: 0.35
, sydney
Weight: 0.34
, tasmania
Weight: 0.34
, brisbane
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good city 1.00
is city 0.93
be best city live 0.87
be best city live in 0.87
is second city 0.83
be city with weather 0.81
be city of sport 0.81
is liveable city 0.81
is second liveable city 0.81
is most liveable city 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(brisbane, is liveable city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sydney, is liveable city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sydney, be best city live in)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sydney, be best city live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sydney, is most liveable city)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(liverpool, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(liverpool, is city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(manchester, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(manchester, is city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(brisbane, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(brisbane, is city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(sydney, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sydney, is city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(sydney, be best city live in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sydney, be best city live in)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(melbourne, is good city)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(melbourne, is city)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(melbourne, is city)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(melbourne, is city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is second liveable city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is second city)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is good city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(melbourne, is good city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(liverpool, is city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(manchester, is city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(brisbane, is city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(sydney, is city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is good city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(brisbane, is liveable city)
...